Thursday, July 31, 2008

George Eldon Ladd (July 31, 1911 - 1982)

Since my previous post on Ladd, A Biography of George Eldon Ladd (OUP, 2008), I have taken the time to read the short biographies included in the following books:
"The experience at Harvard brought Ladd into direct contact with scholarship of the highest caliber and provided him with a personal standard throughout his career. He is reported to have said, 'Harvard didn't change what I believed, but it certainly did change the way I held my belief'" (p. 229).
"Ladd opened the door for evangelical scholars to use the critical methods of biblical research, making the credibility he desired possible for those who came after him" (p. 356).
"Ladd was convinced that the Scriptures were the Word of God and that they were an essential part of the ministry of both the pulpit and the lectern. He struggled with many personal matters in life that were at times overwhelming to him. Most of these stemmed from his dealing with his fundamentalist past. He saw that he was sometimes caught between two fierce opponents: the fundamentalists on the right, who were literalists in their interpretation of the Bible and suspicious of critical scholarship, and the liberal scholars, who distrusted any evangelical or conservative contributions to biblical scholarship."
Here is another note about a full-length, critical biography of George Ladd.

D'Elia, John A. A Place at the Table: George Eldon Ladd and the Rehabilitation of Evangelical Scholarship in America. (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008). Hardback, 304 pages. $45.00 USD (list price).

ISBNs
: 9780195341676
/ 0195341678

Purchase
:

Share/Bookmark

Schreiner's New Testament Theology Now Available in UK

A few days ago I received the copy of Schreiner's New Testament Theology (Baker Academic, 2008, USA) that I had purchased from the Westminster Bookstore. I hope to be able to start reading in it soon. Well, this morning, while browsing the Inter-Varsity Press (UK) site, I learned that they have published the UK edition and that it is now available for purchase (released 18/07/2008). Here's what their edition looks like, along with the table of contents:

New Testament Theology

Magnifying God in Christ

Thomas R Schreiner

£24.99
Hardback 976 pages
ISBN 9781844743094

In this comprehensive survey of key themes and emphases, Thomas Schreiner unfolds the riches of New Testament theology through the lens of salvation history, showing how fruitful the 'promise - fulfillment', 'already - not yet' paradigm is for understanding the New Testament.

Contents

Introduction

Part 1. The Fulfillment of God's Saving Purpose: The Already - Not Yet

1. The Kingom of God in the Synoptic Gospels
2. Eternal Life and Eschatology in John's Theology
3. Inaugurated Eschatology Outside the Gospels

Part 2. The God of the Promise: the Saving Work of the Father, Son, and Spirit

4. The Centrality of God in New Testament Theology
5. The Centrality of Christ in the Synoptic Gospels
6. The Messiah and the Son of Man in the Gospels
7. The Son of God, I Am, and Logos
8. Jesus' Saving Work in the Gospels
9. Jesus' Saving Work in Acts
10. The Christology of Paul
11. The Saving Work of God and Christ According to Paul
12. The Christology of Hebrews - Revelation
13. The Holy Spirit

Part 3. Experiencing the Promise: Believing and Obeying

14. The Problem of Sin
15. Faith and Obedience
16. The Law and Salvation History

Part 4. The People of the Promise and the Future of the Promise

17. The People of the Promise
18. The Social World of God's People
19. The Consummation of God's Promises

Epilogue
Appendix: Reflections on New Testament Theology
Bibliography


Share/Bookmark

Book Review: Jesus the Evangelist by Richard D. Phillips

This book was reviewed by Doug Smith.

Phillips, Richard D. Jesus the Evangelist: Learning to Share the Gospel from the Book of John. Lake Mary, FL: Reformation Trust Pub, 2007. Jacketed Hardcover, xii, 195 pages. $19.00

(Review copy courtesy of Reformation Trust.)

Purchase: Reformation Trust ($15.20) | WTS ($12.54) | CBD ($15.99) | Amazon ($14.82)

ISBNs: 1567690882 / 9781567690880

Excerpts:
Book Info Sheet
Table of Contents and Sample Chapter

Rev. Richard D. Phillips is the senior minister of Second Presbyterian Church in Greenville, S.C., and he also serves on the board of directors for the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals. He has written numerous books including What’s So Great About the Doctrines of Grace? (Ligonier, 2008), The Reformed Expository Commentary: Zechariah (P&R, 2007), Holding Hands, Holding Hearts (P&R, 2006), The Reformed Expository Commentary: Hebrews (P&R, 2006), and What Is the Lord’s Supper? (P&R, 2005).

A book on evangelism could focus on the ways a particular person from church history approached evangelism. Or it could focus on a particular method without necessarily invoking a particular person. Or it could do what this book does. Jesus the Evangelist names the One who is possibly the most overlooked evangelist of all time, but was also the only perfect evangelist. The book strikes gold as it begins to mine riches from the One who is the heart of the gospel message.

Jesus the Evangelist is aimed at two audiences, both of whom represent ironic extremes. First is the Christian who understands the gospel and isn’t terribly interested in sharing it. Then is the zealot with a poor grasp of the gospel, but a great desire to share it. Phillips purposes to motivate theologically minded individuals to evangelize and instruct those zealous for evangelism who need to better understand the gospel.

Jesus the Evangelist is divided into three parts. The first, on biblical principles of evangelism, covers much of John 1, delving into “The Witness of John the Baptist and the Calling of the First Disciples.” Phillips makes this application for Christians from the witness of John the Baptist: “This is our pattern of witness: We are to live as lights in the world to create opportunities for witness; we are to refuse to focus attention on ourselves; and then we are to be the voices that present the Word, Jesus Christ” (p. 24).

The book also provides a helpful foundation for Christians to understand themselves in relation to Christ. After referencing John the Baptist’s declaration that he was unworthy to untie Jesus’ sandal (John 1:26b-27), Phillips writes,

    Rabbinic writings indicate that disciples were required to perform all kinds of menial services for their rabbis, but not this! Not untying the strap of a sandal! But John said that not only was it not beneath him to perform such a menial task for Jesus, it was above him! So great is the glory of Christ!
    Do you feel this way? Do you count it an awesome privilege to serve Jesus in any way possible? Instead of begrudging your Christian duties and especially any actual sacrifice you are called to make, are you overwhelmed at the privilege of simply serving a glorious Lord like Him? If you are not, your witness will lack power. But if you convey to people what a thrill it is to know and serve the Lord Jesus, your witness will be that much more effective. (p. 26)

Part two deals with the theology of the gospel, highlighting “Jesus’ Witness to Nicodemus.” He looks to John 3 for principles of sharing the gospel “with the ‘better kind’ of people, that is, with people who enjoy wide admiration and thus may never have considered their need for a Savior” (p. 60). Phillips highlights the new birth as a necessity, as a supernatural work of God, and as a change that is revealed by its effects. He focuses on the importance and centrality of the cross. He also speaks of the teaching of John 3:16-18 in regard to salvation and condemnation by quoting Leon Morris:

    It is not the purpose of the shining of the sun to cast shadows. But . . . shadows are inevitable. The shadows are, so to speak, the other side of the sunshine. So it is with condemnation and the coming of the Son of God. He did not come in order that people be condemned. But there are great moral issues involved, and those who refuse salvation thus condemn themselves. (pp. 101-102)

In other words, Christ did not come to condemn but to save. Yet by refusing His salvation, those who reject Him can only blame themselves for their condemnation.

Part three examines Jesus’ practice of evangelism, demonstrated in His witness to the Samaritan woman in John 4. The author sets Nicodemus side by side with the woman to show some key differences and similarities. “Nicodemus was a man at the top of life,” whereas the woman was at the bottom. “There can be little doubt that John placed these two figures side by side to show that the gospel is for everyone . . . the glory of the gospel is that anyone—regardless of gender, race, education, wealth, or social position—may be saved through faith in Jesus Christ” (pp. 108-109).

John 4 demonstrates Jesus’ care for the lost, His disregard of ungodly social and religious barriers, and His connecting with people. Jesus purposely went through Samaria to meet with this woman, and Jesus the Evangelist urges Christians to step out of their comfortable subculture to go to others who need the gospel.

In addition to loving and genuinely connecting with others, Phillips urges Christians to deal with sin seriously in evangelism. He writes the following to highlight the seriousness of sin:

    If you commit just three sins per day—if you are irreverent, dishonest, malicious, lustful, or covetous just three times in a day—and the great majority of us break God’s law in thought or deed at least that many times in a [sic] hour!— you will commit more than a thousand sins per year. If you live for seventy-five years, as many of us will, when you die you will arrive in God’s court with seventy-five thousand sins to be dealt with. How would a human judge respond to a criminal with seventy-five thousand violations of the civil law? Surely he would impose the maximum penalty! God hates sin more than any human judge, and He has decreed that the “wages of sin is death” (Rom. 6:23). How important it is, then, that we find a way to deal with our sin before appearing before God’s judgment. (p. 138)

Jesus the Evangelist urges us to seek to turn questions, evasions, and objections back to Jesus—to the Savior of sinners.

Each of the book’s thirteen chapters concludes with discussion questions. It concludes with an appendix on “The Sovereignty of God in Evangelism,” which argues that both divine sovereignty and human responsibility are biblical teachings and therefore not incompatible. He counters the common objection that belief in God’s sovereignty undermines evangelism, listing several ways this doctrine should impact evangelism. Our evangelism should be biblical and prayerful. God’s Word and God’s Spirit using that Word are both necessary for conversions. Our evangelism should be personal, zealous, and creative. Finally, we should never lose heart in evangelism.

Jesus the Evangelist gives an excellent exposition and application of key passages in the Gospel of John. The book strikes gold, but it leaves many veins untapped as well. Other works could follow up on this book by exploring Jesus’ discourses to the multitudes, particularly His “I am” sayings. John MacArthur’s The Gospel According to Jesus (recently revised and expanded for the second time) is an example of a wider approach and would complement Phillips’s work beautifully.

While focusing on the verbal witness of John the Baptist and Jesus, the author does not demean methods such as addressing strangers, passing out tracts, or preaching in the open air. He says, “Instead of picking and choosing . . . we can best profit by considering all of these approaches and making use of them as God gives us opportunity” (p. 46). However, Phillips disapproves of the “altar call,” characterizing it as “unbiblical” and “deceitful manipulation” (p. 180) that violates the dishonesty condemned in 2 Corinthians 4:2. He especially targets evangelists who strategically manipulate by planting people to raise hands or respond by walking forward, in order to incite others to do so. Phillips argues persuasively. Furthermore, the altar call is fraught with danger and a dubious pedigree. But I think he may be unfair to those who use a post-sermon public invitation, but carefully clarify that walking the aisle is not salvific or commanded by God.

The book does not sugarcoat responses to those who neglect evangelism. Phillips blames laziness and self-centeredness for ineffective evangelism:

    We are not willing to cross the street to meet people. We do not care enough for the eternal destiny of friends, family members, and co-workers to risk the social hazard of talking about the Lord. (p. 111)

He also reminds us that evangelism is hard work:

    If we care for others’ salvation, we will expend ourselves in ministry to them . . . if we do not find ourselves sometimes needing a rest from our labors—then we are not likely to accomplish much in Christian ministry. (p. 111)

The discussion questions make this an ideal book for intense personal or group study. It could easily be adapted for use in Sunday school or other teaching scenarios, and would also be a useful complement to commentaries on the book of John.

To be a Christian is to be a follower of Christ. Furthermore, Phillips points out, “To be a Christian is to be called as an evangelist.” Jesus the Evangelist is an excellent resource to help Christians become more like their Master by being faithful to spread His good news.


Share/Bookmark

Monday, July 28, 2008

New Books from the Westminster Bookstore

I eagerly jumped at the opportunity to purchase a few books during Westminster Bookstore's end of Summer sale, and they arrived safely today!





The books were packed well and the delivery was swift. I didn't realize how large these books are. I have a LOT of reading to do! Whooohooo!

These are the books I purchased:

The Mission of God: Unlocking the Bible's Grand Narrative (Hardcover) by Wright, Christopher J. H.
$38.00 $19.00

Dictionary of Major Biblical Interpreters (Second Edition - Hardcover) by McKim, Donald
$45.00 $22.50

New Testament Theology: Magnifying God in Christ (Hardcover) by Schreiner, Thomas R.
$44.99 $22.50


Share/Bookmark

Sunday, July 27, 2008

The Holiness of God

I'm still reading feverishly along the lines of OT Theology, but today I have been profitably distracted by Phil Brown's musings upon holiness:
By way of formulating a response to the last post, I came upon a few comments upon the holiness of God by A. W. Tozer in his classic book, The Knowledge of the Holy. He writes as follows:
The feeling for mystery, even for the Great Mystery, is basic in human nature and indispensable to religious faith, but it is not enough. Because of it men may whisper, "That awful Thing," but they do not cry, "Mine Holy One!" In the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures God carries forward His self-revelation and gives it personality and moral content. This awful Presence is shown to be not a Thing but a moral Being with all the warm qualities of genuine personality. More than this, He is the absolute quintessence of moral excellence, infinitely perfect in righteousness, purity, rectitude, and incomprehensible holiness. And in all this He is uncreated, self-sufficient and beyond the power of human thought to conceive or human speech to utter.

Through the self-revelation of God in the Scriptures and the illumination of the Holy Spirit the Christian gains everything and loses nothing. To his idea of God there are added the twin concepts of personality and moral character, but there remains the original sense of wonder and fear in the presence of the world-filling Mystery. Today his heart may leap up with the happy cry, “Abba Father, my Lord and my God!” Tomorrow he may kneel with the delighted trembling to admire and adore the High and Lofty One that inhabiteth eternity.

Holy is the way God is. To be holy He does not conform to a standard. He is that standard. He is absolutely holy with an infinite, incomprehensible fullness of purity that is incapable of being other than it is. Because He is holy, His attributes are holy; that is, whatever we think of as belonging to God must be thought of as holy.

God is holy and He has made holiness the moral condition necessary to the health of His universe. Sin’s temporary presence in the world only accents this. Whatever is holy is healthy; evil is a moral sickness that must end ultimately in death. The formation of the language itself suggests this, the English word holy deriving from the Anglo-Saxon halig, hal, meaning, “well, whole.”

(A.W. Tozer, The Knowledge of the Holy, Harper & Row, 1975. p. 112-13, emphasis mine.)
This book has been reissued by HarperOne [Amazon $10.36 pb, 1998 | Amazon $13.57 hc, Large Print/Gift Edition, 1992] and reprinted by Authentic [Amazon $9.99 pb, 2008].
Share/Bookmark

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Book Review: New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics

The following book review was submitted by Dr. Paul Martin Henebury of Veritas School of Theology and is being simulposted here and at SharperIron.org.

__________

McGrath, Gavin, Walter Campbell Campbell-Jack and C. Stephen Evans, eds. New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics. Leicester, England: Inter-Varsity Press; Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 2006. cloth, xx + 779 pages. $45.00

Purchase: IVP | WTS ($27.45) | CBD ($32.99) | Amazon ($32.85)

ISBNs: 0830824510 / 9780830824519 / 1844740935 / 9781844740932

Subject: Apologetics

When Norman Geisler published his Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics in 1999 he provided the Christian community with a helpful, if slanted reference book on the defense of the faith. Like the Catholic Handbook by Kreeft and Tacelli, it reflected a heavily Thomistic approach. This offering from the UK, produced by IVP and including articles by many contributors, reflects a more diversified approach.

The choice of articles is on the whole excellent. It appears that a lot of thought has gone into the selection. We find good coverage of such pertinent topics as “Advertising,” “Authority,” “Critical Realism,” “Foundationalism,” “Globalization,” and “Islam.” Included also are many cameos of important thinkers (e.g. Augustine, Barth, Dooyeweerd, Henry, Lewis, Newbigin, Wittgenstein) that support the formal entries.

The dictionary is divided into two parts; the first fifty pages being given over to six essays on the history, role and relevance of the discipline. These essays range from the excellent (K. Vanhoozer on “Theology and Apologetics”), to the mediocre (A. M. Robbins on “Legitimacy of Apologetics”). The first essay, by W. Edgar, is a skillful historical survey of the subject with good observations about the future. Next is C. S. Evans limited treatment of “Approaches to Christian Apologetics.” It could be summed up as excellent on Plantinga, useful on Swinburne, not much use besides. As with Christian philosophers generally, one gets the impression that Evans and others are not overly familiar with the work of many important evangelical apologists. Then follows Robbins’ piece, which is worth reading for its insights on postmodernism, but quite generic otherwise. I confess that I found it difficult to follow his reasoning in places. It was also off-putting to read an essay on the legitimacy of the apologetic task that did not cite Scripture!

K. Birkett’s essay on the viability of apologetics in our non-Christian culture mentions some essential matters with which apologists must always be concerned (e.g. the interface between faith and reason; the importance of clear terms), even if she fails to provide much in the way of how these matters have been and may be dealt with by apologists. She also seems to regard apologia as purely defensive and inward looking (p. 33). But this would be incorrect in view of 1 Peter 3:15 (cf. Jude 3) which surely involves a challenge to non-Christian outlooks from the perspective of God’s right to be God.

Skipping Vanhoozer’s contribution for a moment, the sixth introductory piece entitled “Christian Apologetics in the non-Western World," is quite good, even if it is more accurately described as a survey of how “Christians” – very broadly conceived, have approached doing apologetics among Indian Hindus. This article, by A. Aghamkar, is purely descriptive, which sorely limits its value.

As already indicated, K. Vanhoozer on “Theology and Apologetics” is superb. Not only is it abreast of the latest thinking in the related areas of philosophy of religion and hermeneutics, but it is self-consciously aligned with the theological construct of Scripture. The author is skeptical of the agenda of classical apologetics to “prove” that theism in general is true (pp. 35, 39). Drawing on the insights of certain non-conservatives like Hans Frei, John Milbank, and Bruce Marshall, he asserts that “When Christian beliefs are taken as true on their own terms, all other truths in the world fall into their proper place” (p. 40). Unsurprisingly, Vanhoozer focuses attention on “the epistemic primacy of Jesus Christ” (pp. 39-40) and the Christological interpretation of reality (p. 42). He even supplies a brief programmatic framework within which this form of rational defense can take place (pp. 41-42). Perhaps the piece is a little shallow when discussing the place of evidences, but one can’t ask for everything. Whether intentionally or not the ghost of Cornelius Van Til (correctly understood!) looms over Vanhoozer’s essay. Indeed, it would be difficult to find a more VanTilian thesis that failed to mention the Westminster polymath.

We have felt it necessary to interact somewhat with the articles in Part One of the dictionary. As for the articles in the second (and main) part of the volume, they are, of course, of differing quality; but, on the whole, the standard is high. Among the best I came across are “Accommodation Theory” by A. Billington; “Certainty,” “Infinite Series,” “Self-refuting Statements,” and “Unregenerate Knowledge of God” by J. Frame; “Evil,” and “Satan” by H. Blocher; “Deity of Christ” by T. R. Thompson; “Historical Apologetics” by J. Beilby; “Miracles in Scripture”by P. G. Bolt; “Noetic Effects of Sin” by W. Edgar; “Gnosticism,” and “Pascal” by D. Groothuis; “Monism” by A. F. Holmes; “Thomism” by A. Vos; “Nature of Truth” by P. Hicks; and “Worldview” by A. Wolters.

Groothuis, a verificationalist, covers both “Theistic Proofs” and “Point of Contact.” Both essays are very informative. As a thorough-going presuppositionalist I am far from agreeing that a good theistic argument only provides “sufficient reason to believe that monotheism is objectively true” (italics mine). 1 Peter 3:15 does not endorse reasoning to a god. And I cannot understand why opponents of Van Til do not represent his views on point of contact correctly. Anybody can read Van Til’s treatment of this in, (e.g., his Christian Apologetics) and see that the epistemological point of contact does exist by virtue of the fact that every man knows his Creator in some sense. Furthermore, the Christian is not all he should be (or will be), and the non-Christian cannot live upon all he professes to believe and live rationally in this world. The antithesis between saved and lost is not absolute, nor, in this age, can it be. The writer of the piece on “Common Ground” is even further off-beam in this regard. While we are on the subject of Van Til, it was surprising to read P. Hicks’ opinion (“Evidentialism”) that Reformed Epistemologists were partly influenced by him. A survey of even the best thinkers among this school reveals that they suffer from similar false impressions in this regard to those just mentioned.

As might be expected from a reference work arising out of Great Britain, the articles on “Origins” (R. J. Berry) and “Scientific Dating” (R. S. White) are none too sympathetic towards young-earth creationism. The former is by a theistic evolutionist and leaves a decidedly unpleasant after-taste in the mouth. There are other qualified men in the U. K. – one thinks of Stuart Burgess and Andy McIntosh – who might have been called upon to provide a more satisfactory effort.

The pieces on “Natural Theology” by R. C. Koons, and “First Principles” by S. Theron I found to be a little confusing. The contribution on “Fideism” (J. W. Ward) was so inclusive as to bring all faith commitments, even biblical ones, under its purview.

If I were to choose just one article to have someone read it would be either the aforementioned essay by Vanhoozer in Part One or the one on “Certainty” by J. Frame. This article is such an outstanding display of the antithesis between Christian and unbelieving views of the subject that it acts as a sober reminder that we are to be fully committed to the revelation of God in the Bible.

Overall, the New Dictionary of Apologetics is a success. I might have singled out many other entries for commendation or criticism, but this review is already long enough. One might have one or two gripes about some matters (such as the decision not to indicate who wrote what in the list of contributors). But for all that, this addition to the apologetics literature of evangelicalism is most welcome.
Click here to learn more about SharperIron book reviews.
Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

TheoSource Has Been Wordled!!!

Thanks to Doug Smith, of Gazing at Glory, TheoSource has been Wordled.

Theosource:

I thought this was pretty cool and could not hep myself from trying it out, too. You can add text, the URL of any blog, blog feed, or any other web page that has an Atom or RSS feed.

At the bottom, you'll see where I took the text from my post, Tools for Building a Theological Library, and Wordled it. It appears that Wordle arranges words from the most frequently used (less common words) displayed in the largest font size to the least frequently used in the smallest font size. It also appears that when you Wordle a blog feed, only the most recent content is used. So, what you have is yet another way to read your favorite blogs. Just Wordle the feed URL and you'll quickly see what has been most prominently discussed on the blog.

Here are a few blogs I Wordled.

Narrative and Ontology


Al Mohler's Blog

Gazing at Glory


Andy Naselli's Blog

Ancient Hebrew Poetry


TheoSource Tools



Share/Bookmark

Summer Sale at Westminster Bookstore 50% Off Select Titles

If you haven't given the Westminster Bookstore a try, now is a good time to do so. I try to link to them as much as possible because they have a good selection, great prices, excellent customer service and are a institution dedicated to edifying the church (as opposed to "making a buck").

Here are a handful that I think would be worthy purchases (some I've read, others with which I am familiar). The prices are only good while stock is available and/or until the end of July (7/30/08).

ESV, The Literary Study Bible (Black Letter) by Leland Ryken & Philip Graham Ryken (Editors)
$49.99 $24.99

Justified in Christ: God's Plan for Us in Justification (Paperback) by Oliphint, K. Scott (Editor)
$18.99 $9.50

Christ and Culture Revisited (Hardcover) by Carson, D. A.
$24.00 $12.00

Engaging the Doctrine of God: Contemporary Protestant Perspectives (Paperback) by McCormack, Bruce L.
$26.99 $13.50

The Mission of God: Unlocking the Bible's Grand Narrative (Hardcover) by Wright, Christopher J. H.
$38.00 $19.00






Gospel-Centered Hermeneutics: Foundations and Principles of Evangelical Biblical Interpretation (Hardcover) by Goldsworthy, Graeme
$29.00 $14.50

Devoted Life: An Invitation to the Puritan Classics by Kapic, Kelly M.
$19.00 $9.50

Breaking the Idols of Your Heart: How to Navigate the Temptations of Life (Paperback) by Dan B. Allender and Tremper Longman III
$15.00 $7.50

Genesis: A Commentary (Hardcover) by Waltke, Bruce K.
$39.99 $19.99

Jesus According to Scripture: Restoring the Portrait from the Gospels (Paperback) by Bock, Darrell L.
$36.99 $18.50


Disciplines of a Godly Woman, Paperback by Hughes, Barbara
$15.99 $7.99

Disciplines of a Godly Man, Paperback by Hughes, R. Kent
$15.99 $7.99

New Testament Theology: Magnifying God in Christ (Hardcover) by Schreiner, Thomas R.
$44.99 $22.50




BE QUICK!!!!

Our everyday low shipping is only $4 for orders $35 or more

Any size order—anywhere in the U.S.—except Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico. Shipping for orders under $35 is $7.50 per order.
www.wtsbooks.com/?utm_source=jbutton&utm_medium=jbutton

Westminster Bookstore is affiliated with Westminster Theological Seminary. For more information on the Seminary, please visit www.wts.edu


Share/Bookmark

Friday, July 18, 2008

What Did the OT Writers Know?

In the comments to my post, Mediating Between Dispensational and Covenant Theologies, Don Johnson brought up the issue of Kaiser's position on what the OT writers (particularly the prophets) understood as they wrote. I thoroughly agree with Don that "this conception of what the OT writers knew (and when did they know it) is an important part of understanding the whole."

Kaiser addressed this issue when interviewed by Andy Cheung. He made the point that he believes that the OT writers had an "adequate" understanding of what they were writing. "Adequate" doesn't imply that the writers had a full understanding of all of the details (especially concerning eschatology), but rather that they knew what was essential. This is key to the view of progressive revelation and to Kaiser's argument and methodology in both Toward and Old Testament Theology (1978) and The Promise-Plan of God (2008). It is also key to Eugene Merrill's argument and methodology in Everlasting Dominion (2006).

What follows are a few excerpts from the three aforementioned books that address (and hopefully) clarify this issue.

Eugene Merrill –

[T]he true prophet was a vehicle of divine revelation, one who declared not his own word but also that of God. (Everlasting Dominion, p. 92)

In line with our frequently reiterated method, we shall attempt to blend both a canonical and a chronological approach in an attempt to be sensitive to the impetus lying behind the present (Hebrew) canonical order as well as to the principle of progressive revelation of which, one would think, the prophets themselves were consciously aware.#[see Kaiser, Toward an Old Testament Theology, p. 11] That is, later prophets were in possession of the works of their predecessors and used them, even if not explicitly, as a matrix within which they formulated their own contributions to the emerging collection of inspired works. (Everlasting Dominion, p. 492, emphasis mine)

Walter Kaiser –

Even more crucial, can it be shown form the claims of the original participants in the events and thoughts of these OT texts that they were conscious of a continuing stream of events, meanings, and ideas which preceded them and that they felt themselves obligated to acknowledge some type of permanent, normative demands laid on their beliefs and actions?

There is an inner center or plan to which each writer consciously contributed.(Toward an Old Testament Theology, p. 11, emphasis mine)

The accumulation of the total message was never far from most of the writers’ minds as they chose the words or connected their experiences with what had been their religious and revelational heritage up to that point in time. Notice, this is not the usual Analogy of Faith procedure in which the NT or later theology is allowed to set the pace for earlier passages. On the contrary, it is what we will call the Analogy of Antecedent Scripture where chronologically antecedent canonical theology must be checked to see whether it informed the theology under investigation. (Toward an Old Testament Theology, p. 16, emphasis mine)

Thus the prophetic promise was not a group of scattered predictions that only later made sense after Christ appeared and others had reinterpreted many of the old prophetic words. If the prophets merely had been prognosticating or foretelling the future, then the focus of their message would have fallen only on two things: (1) the word spoken before the event, and (2) the final fulfilling event itself. While this view of prophecy may be proper and legitimate in itself, at least according to some students of prophecy, it fails to capture precisely that aspect that had captivated the hearts and minds of the Old Testament writers and saints the most.

The prophets’ messages were not heterogeneous and disconnected predictions, randomly announced throughout an otherwise dull drone of chastisements. Nor was prediction even the main feature of prophecy. Rather, the prophets were proclaimers of righteousness, preaching both law and promise, grace and judgment, to motivate the people to repentance and a life of obedience in the will and plan of God. Their predictions were often given as incentives to their contemporaries for holy living in that day, seeing that the future belonged to their God and to his righteous reign.

More was to be found in these predictions, of course, than novel glimpses of the future scattered as bits of candy to whet the appetite of a sensate or occult mentality that hungered to be the first to know what would be in tomorrow’s headlines in the newspapers. Instead of any such whimsical purpose as this, the prophets often deliberately cast their words about the future in the phraseology and conceptual patterns of past prophecies. There was a deliberate borrowing and supplementing from the previous words of the Abrahamic-Davidic promise. Hence, for them, the future was part of God’s single, cumulative, ongoing promise from the past as well as a pointer to the future. (The Promise-Plan of God, pp. 152-53; compare with Toward an Old Testament Theology, pp. 183-84, emphasis mine)


Share/Bookmark

Quick Review: David: Man of Prayer, Man of War by Walter Chantry

David: Man of Prayer, Man of War
by Walter J. Chantry
ISBN 13 #978-0-85151-9531 \ 304 pages
Clothbound \ $18.00
Banner of Truth, 2007

Purchase: WTS ($10.80) | Monergism ($13.50) | Amazon | CBD ($16.99)
Comments:

"Chantry's book on David consists of 35 short chapters, which originally appeared as articles in the Banner of Truth magazine. His treatment of the Scriptural account "fills out" David's life. The book reads almost like a novel, except with applications that seem to arise naturally from the text. It's a non-technical treatment that anyone can enjoy and profit from, but it's substantial, not fluffy. I think the book models a good style for preachers and teachers in handling Bible biography." (~Tim Ashcraft, TheoSource)

From the author's Introduction:
The one constant with David in every condition was expressed in Psalm 16:8: 'I have set the LORD always before me.'

In all the rapid alterations of his life David thought of the Most High God and expressed his devout feelings toward his Maker and Redeemer....

...We love this man for showing us how to pray from every point of life's compass. We love him for showing us how, in the midst of spiritual failure, we too can draw near to the Lord again in trust and devotion.

Perfectionists will not be comfortable with David. Those who stumble often, but who always turn with melted hearts to God for pardon and help, will find in him a brother for all situations. Such people will love the sacred history of his life and find it totally engrossing. (pp. viii - ix)
__________
Pastor Chantry's sermons on the Life of David can be listened to and/or downloaded from sermondaudio.com (click here for the series | 58 sermons in all).
Share/Bookmark

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Summer Reading - What Are You Reading?

OPEN POST

I have shared with you what I am reading (and reviewing), and now I am interested in knowing what you are reading. So, here is an "open post" for you to share with us your own summer reading list.

What are you reading, and what would your recommend us to consider reading?

Please respond in the comments of this post.

If you have nothing to read and would like a review copy in exchange for a book review (to be posted here on TheoSource), I'd like to hear from you. Send me a review of something you have read this summer and I'll send you a new book to review. You can find a list of books that I have in hand that need to be reviewed here (bottom of the post).
Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

A Reader's Hebrew Bible Now in Its 2nd Printing

Phil Brown advises us that Zondervan has already issued a 2nd printing of A Reader's Hebrew Bible and that it is now available.

If you haven't purchased a copy, I highly recommend it.

A Reader’s Hebrew Bible. Edited by A. Philip Brown II & Bryan W. Smith. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2008. Italian Duo-Tone™, 1,680 pages. [WTS | CBD | Amazon]

Related Posts -

Share/Bookmark

RBL Review of The UBS Greek New Testament: A Reader's Edition

Steven R. Johnson, review of Barclay M. Newman, ed., The UBS Greek New Testament: A Reader's Edition, Review of Biblical Literature (2008).

This is a very nice review which includes some important details for those interested in making the best use of this new tool. Steven R. Johnson is Assistant Professor of Religion at Lycoming College, Williamsport, PA. Here are a few of his concluding remarks.
Caveats aside, the publication of the Reader’s Edition is good news. It can be an excellent tool for pastors wanting to maintain or revive their facility in Greek for the purpose of reading the New Testament and for scholars and advanced students of Greek who desire to sit down and simply read the New Testament. Further, provided that they use the Reader’s Edition as it is intended, intermediate-level Greek students might benefit from the Reader’s Edition most of all.
Related Resources -

Share/Bookmark

C.T. Studd - Atypical Missionary

Not, “a typical missionary,” but, “atypical,” not according to type. The Bible tells us that “not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth (1 Cor. 1:26). However, on this day in 1931 a rich man entered the Kingdom of Heaven, having given his life in service to Jesus Christ.

Charles T. Studd (Dec. 2, 1860 - July 16, 1931) grew up in the lap of luxury. His father’s wealth allowed Charles to attend Cambridge University, where he became a standout in the game of cricket. But God’s plans for Studd didn’t include a career in sports. Charles’ father, Edward, was converted during one of D.L. Moody’s England campaigns. After this, a preacher visiting the Studd home won young Charles to Christ. Studd testified that, when he trusted in Jesus, the joy and peace of the Lord flooded his soul.

Studd spent the next six years in what he described as “an unhappy backslidden state,” hanging on to the life of a successful athlete. His brother’s illness in 1884 caused him to reevaluate fame and fortune, after which he devoted his life to service for Christ as a missionary. Along with six other students, Studd offered himself to Hudson Taylor and the China Inland Mission in 1885. These young men, who went against convention, became known as “the Cambridge Seven.”

One of Studd’s favorite sayings was, “Some want to live within the sound of church or chapel bell; I want to run a rescue shop within a yard of hell.” This atypical missionary didn’t mind hard work. After the death of his parents, he gave his inheritance away to various Christian ministries and simply trusted God to supply all his needs. Studd faced opposition during his time in China, but the Lord blessed him with a wife and four daughters. Ill health forced him back to England for a while, during which time he traveled and preached, raising awareness of the need of missions and seeing the Lord move among the youth in revival.

Studd then went to India for six years and saw much success among the British officials and local community. When he returned to England, he became impressed with the spiritual need of central Africa. Though doctors advised against it, Studd went to Africa to spread the Gospel. His daughter Pauline and her husband Norman Grubb joined him in this ministry. Norman would later become his father-in-law’s biographer. Studd died on July 16, 1931 of gallstones. His son-in-law Norman took the reins of the ministry Studd had founded and continued the work.

C.T. Studd, who forsook a life of wealth and athletic acclaim, was greatly used by the Lord in reaching many areas with the Gospel. I’m glad the Lord said, “Not many wise…not many noble,” rather than, “Not any wise or noble.” Are you successful in sports or business? Do you have great worldly opportunities that make the Gospel seem unattractive to you? Consider that faith in Christ and service for Him will last when all earthly glory is laid in the dust. Thank God for grace that can reach any heart that to us may seem impregnable!


————————————————
for further reading:

Norman P. Grubb, C.T. Studd: Cricketer and Pioneer (Christian Literature Crusade, 1985)
Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Walter Kaiser Interviewed by Andy Cheung

Midlands Bible College and Divinity Schools has been organizing and posting transcripts of interviews with well-known scholars in a series called "Talks with Scholars." Not too long ago I directed you to an interview Andy Cheung conducted with Thomas R. Schreiner. Cheung's latest interview is with Walter C. Kaiser, Jr. Cheung queries Kaiser about his lasted book, The Promise-Plan of God: A Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments (Zondervan, 2008).

If you have purchased or are considering purchasing this book, I think that you will appreciate this interview as much as I did. Cheung does a great job interacting with Kasier and getting him to talk about his latest (and a forthcoming) writing projects.

Here is a list of interviews available to date:

Share/Bookmark

Monday, July 14, 2008

Waltke's An Old Testament Theology Wins ECPA Award

In the Bible Reference & Study category Bruce Waltke's An Old Testament Theology: An Exegetical, Canonical, and Thematic Approach (Zondervan, 2007) is the winner of the ECPA Christian Book Award.

View the other Winners

As I have been reading through this massive tome, I have found it to be encyclopedic in nature. The book is outlined very clearly with nary a pertinent issue left undiscussed. It is a treasure trove on Biblical Theology (focused on the OT but with eyes wide-open to the NT).

I am glad to see that it is receiving such recognition. Unlike some OT Theologies that will only collect dust, this volume is sure to repay bountifully the student who carefully and frequently puts it to use.

Congratulations Dr. Waltke!
Share/Bookmark

Mediating Between Dispensational and Covenant Theologies

Walter C. Kaiser, Jr's The Promise-Plan of God: A Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments (Zondervan, 2008) is a revision and expansion of his Toward an Old Testament Theology (Zondervan, 1978). The introduction to this volume is brand new and replaces the introduction to TaOTT. Kaiser address the values and liabilities of both Dispensational and Covenantal systems of theology, especially "how each decides if there exists one or two 'people(s) of God' (i.e., Israel and the church) and one or two 'program(s) of God' (i.e., a single redemptive-historical program or an earthly and a heavenly program for Israel and the church)" (p. 26). His purpose in the present book is to argue for what he believes to be the unifying theme of the whole Bible. In doing so, it is necessary that he address these two major evangelical systems of Biblical interpretation.

As I first read through this section, I must admit that I feared that Kaiser presented each view in strokes that were far to broad. I decided to give him the benefit of the doubt and tried to assume that he had presented each system in general terms due to space constraints, but after a third round I am certain that this section is designed to suit Kaiser’s purposes more than it gives either system a fair shake.

His presentation of Covenant (Reformed) Theology is reductionistic and outdated. Some may hold to this position, but it, as Kaiser states, is “an older view” (p. 26). What benefit is there in setting up one’s view by presenting an old, and admittedly faulty view? A quick read through contemporary, Reformed scholarship will prove ably that the bilateral view of the Abrahamic covenant has been soundly refuted. At that, although the “older view” emphasized covenant as a unifying theme of Scripture, Reformed scholarship has found better unifying themes, such as Yahweh, Holiness, the sovereignty of God, the glory of God, the kingdom of God, Jesus Christ, and a combination of the kingdom of God and His glory (see Bruce Waltke’s An Old Testament Theology and Gerard Van Gronigen’s Biblical Theology: Audio Transcription of Lesson 2: Biblical Theology, II). Also, “the older view” necessarily saw God as being completely finished with Israel as a nation, but some contemporary, Reformed scholars have carefully rethought that position. Kaiser has simply framed his argument with broad enough strokes to make his case look even better. This is irksome for two reasons: 1) a textbook should present opposing views as adequately and fairly as the author is able and I can’t imagine that Kaiser is unaware of the most current theological views held in Reformed circles; and 2) Kaiser approaches the subject of Biblical Theology from a very strong, exegetical position and with a desire to not be enslaved to a theological system, and I think that his presentation of “promise-plan” is fantastic. I think that he could easily make his case in light of the contemporary, Reformed positions, but the reader is left to work this out on his/her own.

Next, Kaiser presents the Dispensational position but limits the discussion to the traditional/classical view. Granted, many still cling to this paradigm, but many advances have been made among Dispensationalists with respect to the “two peoples of God” and the “two programs of God” issues.

Kaiser frames his position in the way that he does to show how viable an alternative there is in tracing the theme of promise throughout the Bible. As Kaiser presents his mediating position he seeks to correct the former “solutions of the relationship of Israel and the Christian church” (p. 27). First, once you come to see that the covenant with Israel is, in fact, unilateral and unconditional the term promise best describes the situation. Second, the basis of promise is necessarily that of grace. Kaiser’s view holds that “there is only one ‘people of God’ (even though there may be numerous aspects of that same singular group) and there is only one ‘program of God’ (again, with several aspects all within that one umbrella term)” (p. 27).

Later in this Introduction (p. 30) Kaiser tips his hat to Progressive Dispensationalism, but he avoids interacting with this view. If time permits for this volume to be revised, I wish to see this Introduction expanded to deal with contemporary scholarship.
Share/Bookmark

Saturday, July 12, 2008

The Unifying Theme of the Bible | Bruce Waltke

Waltke unpacks this issue more fully in chapter 6 of An Old Testament Theology: An Exegetical, Canonical, and Thematic Approach, but I have only made it into chapter 2. However, Waltke has already provided a sense of direction by addressing the issue of the unity of the Bible in chapter 1.

Having set forth his conservative presuppositions regarding revelation, inspiration, and illumination, Waltke lays out "four ideological and methodological stances...critical to the discipline of biblical theology...assumed in this book" (p. 39). The fourth implication of his presuppositions is his belief in the unity of the Bible. In terms somewhat similar to those of Oehler's definition of special revelation, Waltke reveals what he believes to be the common theme of the Bible, namely,

that God is establishing his kingship over a hostile world to establish his glory. The bond that unites the testaments is the sense of God's divine activity in revelatory history in progressively establishing his rule in heaven on earth from the creation of the cosmos (Genesis 1) to his creation of the new cosmos (Revelation 21-22). (p. 45)
I am compelled to add that in this section Waltke directs the reader via a footnote to Christopher J. H. Wright's Knowing Jesus Through the Old Testament (IVP, 1992) calling it "a superb work" (p. 45, fn. 50). I have not yet read this book, but I recently finished reading Wright's latest book, Salvation Belongs to Our God (IVP, 2008) which seeks to present a cosmic view of God's saving work. Wright, an Old Testament scholar too, is a must read for those interested in Biblical Theology.

Also,
...for his glory God is breaking into this hostile world with his rule... (p. 51)


Share/Bookmark

The Biblical Idea of Revelation | Gustav Friedrich Oehler

The Biblical idea of revelation has its root in the idea of Creation. Revelation is the development of the relation in which God has placed Himself to the world in bringing it into existence. The basis of revelation is laid in the fact that the world was called into existence by the word of God, and was animated by His Spirit. The production of different classes of beings advances teleologically, and reaches its goal only when God has created man in His own image. In this progression the foundation of revelation is laid. For revelation is, in general, God's witness and communication of Himself to the world for the realization of the end of creation, and for the re-establishment of the full communion of man with God. ...

It is only by God's stooping to man in personal testimony to Himself, and by the objective presentation of Himself, that a vital communion is actually established between Him and man. This is the special revelation, which first appears in the form of a covenant between God and a chosen race, and the founding of a kingdom of God among the latter, culminates in the manifestation of God in the flesh, advances from this point to the gathering of a people of God in all nations, and is completed in the making of a new heaven and a new earth (Isa. 65:17, 66:22; Rev. 21:1ff.), where God shall be all in all (1 Cor. 15:28).

(Gustave Friedrich Oehler, Theology of the Old Testament, revised and translated by George E. Day. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, n.d., pp. 14-15, emphasis mine.)

NOTES:

Share/Bookmark

Friday, July 11, 2008

New Book on the History of Andover Newton Theological School

Last October I wrote up a small piece on Richard Furman in which I made mention of his efforts to establish Baptist seminaries. I wrote,
In 1814 Furman was elected as the first president of the Baptist Triennial Convention. As president of the Baptist Convention, Furman continued to press the burden of education upon his brethren. His plans were brilliant, but they did not unfold as he had intended. His original plan was for a central institution in Washington D. C. with preparatory institutions in each state, or between states. From this original plan emerged the Columbian College (now a part of George Washington University). Other institutions that grew out of this plan are Furman Institution (now University), the Mercer Institute (now University), the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, and probably Newton in Massachusetts (now Andover-Newton Theological Seminary). (emphasis added)
Another impetus behind the formation of Newton Theological Seminary was the booming interest in foreign missions. Adoniram Judson, then a student at Andover Theological Seminary (1810), and his friends strongly urged the ministers Massachusetts to address the pressing need of missions to the heathen. This era of missionary zeal saw a handful of new training and supportive institutions birthed.

Needless to say, there is a lot of important history concerning the genesis of Andover Theological Seminary and Newton Theological Seminary. The story of these two early American schools, their union in 1931, and their joint contribution to the evangelical church to this day has been documented in a new book by Margaret Lamberts Bendroth. This week Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishers announced the release of this historical-critical work.

What follows are details about this book and about its author. Researching Bendroth's literary output has given me good reason to think that this book will be a valuable contribution to American Evangelical historical studies. I also expect that we will find plenty of Bendroth's evaluation of the Fundamentalist movement as it pertains to this historic school (note the table of contents listed below).

Bendroth, Margaret Lamberts. A School of the Church: Andover Newton Across Two Centuries. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008.

Format: Hardback. 240 pages; dimensions (in inches): 6 x 9; 29 b&w illustrations; List Price: $28.00 USD

ISBNs: 0802863701 / 978-0-8028-6370-6

Purchase: Eerdmans | Amazon | CBD

Description from the publisher:

Andover Newton Theological School has a storied 200-year history. Margaret Lamberts Bendroth has written a compelling account of this historic institution and its two original sources — Andover Seminary, a Congregational school established in 1808 and the model for theological education in the United States, and Newton Theological Institution, a Baptist school established in 1825 — which merged in 1931. The book offers entirely new material on the development of the school after the 1931 merger.

As part of Andover Newton’s history, Bendroth explores the unquestionable intellectual contributions of the faculty, including Moses Stuart, Alvah Hovey, Gabriel Fackre, Max Stackhouse, Phyllis Trible, and many others. She also examines the many paths intersecting with the school’s story, from American education in general to the development of Protestant thought, to the complex histories of race and gender in American society.


Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

  • Andover Seminary and the Origins of Theological Education in America

  • New England Baptists and the Cure of Souls: The Early Years of the Newton Theological Institution

  • Andover, Newton, and the Benevolent Empire

  • The New Theology Comes to Andover: The Story of the Future Probation Controversy

  • Newton and the Fundamentalist-Modernist Debate

  • Andover’s Harvard Years: From Cambridge to Newton Center

  • Andover Newton and Pastoral Education in the World War II Era

  • Earthquake Years: A Mainline Seminary Weathers the Sixties

  • Andover Newton’s Turn of the Century

  • EPILOGUE: The Andover Newton Legacy
    INDEX

    Margaret Lamberts Bendroth is a historian, executive director of the American Congregational Association and director of the Congregational Library in Boston.

    Bibliography -

    Share/Bookmark